It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

  • Unlearned9545@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    When you push something you push the atoms in the thing. This in turn pushes the adjacent atoms, when push the adjacent atoms all the way down the line. Very much like pushing water in the bathtub, it ripples down the line. The speed at which atoms propogate this ripple is the speed of sound. In air this is roughly 700mph, but as the substance gets harder* it gets faster. For example, aluminum and steel it is about 11,000mph. That’s why there’s a movie trope about putting your ear to the railroad line to hear the train.

    If you are talking about something magically hard then I suppose the speed of sound in that material could approach the speed of light, but still not surpass it. Nothing with mass may travel the speed of light, not even an electron, let alone nuclei.

    *generalizing

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    Ok so since there’s a bunch of science nerds on here and I’m sleep deprived I’m gonna ask my dumb ftl question.

    If you’re on a train and you walk towards the front of the train, your speed measured from outside of the train is the speed of the train (T) plus the speed of you walking (W).

    So if there was a train inside of that train, and you walked inside of that, you’d go the speed of the outside train, plus the speed of the inside train, plus your own walking speed.

    So what if we had a Russian nesting doll of trains, so that the inner most train was, from the outside, going as fast as light and you walked towards the front? Wouldn’t you be going faster than light if you measured your speed from the outside?

    Didn’t come at me with how hard it would be to build a Russian nesting doll of super trains it’s a hypothetical and I’m tired.

    • 4z01235@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      https://www.quora.com/What-if-you-walk-forward-on-a-ship-moving-at-light-speed#%3A~%3Atext=You+would+experience+nothing.%2Cof+travel+wouldn't+exist.

      Because of relativistic effects, from your point of view on the train you would just walk forward. But you would notice a strange effect while the trains were accelerating: your atomically synchronized wristwatch has slowed down and stopped counting time. So it seems that your journey to the front of the train takes no time at all.

      From someone standing on the side of the tracks catching a glimpse of you and the train as you whizz by, the front of the train is moving at light speed. You’re at the back of the train completely frozen still, unable to move forward because the front of the train is moving away at light speed.

      Weird things happen when you’re talking about the limits of physical reality.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        35 minutes ago

        your atomically synchronized wristwatch has slowed down and stopped counting time.

        Wait, surely time would move at a normal speed within your own reference frame. The act of you walking to the front of the inner-most train you are in would be a normal occurence to you, but if you looked out of the window you would see a completely frozen scene.

        Only once you measure time afterwards with an observer would you notice the gaping time difference.

        • 4z01235@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          You are correct, I should have said there was an atomic clock out the window that the walker looked out at.

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Not a science nerd. But I would assume the inner trains would like to push forward, stealing some kinetic energy from the outer train because it pushes itself away from the outer train and making the outer train slower or even push back.

  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Even if it were perfectly rigid, supernaturally so, your push would still only transmit through the stick at the speed of light. The speed of light is the speed of time.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The push would travel at the speed of sound in the stick, much slower than the speed of light

      • Pinklink@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        No it wouldn’t. Sound is air vibration, which has to travel from one place to the next, static atoms don’t have to actually move to a place just transfer kinetic energy to the adjacenct atom, so it would be much closer to the speed of light. Although probably still (relatively (get it??)) slower.

        • 4z01235@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          Sound is air vibration

          Sound is not exclusive to air, it can be generalized to vibrations in any media. Whale song and dolphin echolocation are certainly sounds, and we’re almost always talking about them propagating in water rather than air.

          which has to travel from one place to the next

          No, that isn’t how sound works. In air this would be a description of wind, not sound.

          just transfer kinetic energy to the adjacenct atom

          This is actually a good description of how sound waves propagate.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Matter is made of atoms. Things are only truly rigid in the small scales we deal with usually.

    • vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Damn it even on Lemmy I can’t get to the comments before someone else has the samr idea as me ahaha

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is actually a great example for why that stick must not exist.

    You can also do this with a unbreakable stick and an unbreakable shorter tube. Throw the stick at a high velocity through the tube and it contracts for the point of view of the tube. Then close it shut. Now you have a stick that’s longer than the tube fully contained in it.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If you’re openminded enough to listen to those who disagree with the standard model,
    take an elastic band and turn one end. Instead of the band turning, you’ll have a twist in your band
    and it takes time to unravel the twist. That’s what will happen to the stick and this travels at lightspeed,
    because this is what light does. Light works like ‘the stick’ in your example.
    And if you try turning it faster the ‘elastic band’/stick/‘atom on the other end’ starts breaking.

    If you need FTL communication, then use gravity…somehow.

    • Pinklink@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Probably quantum entanglement, which we (and certainly I) don’t fully understand yet

        • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Space bends due to gravity. Light continues in a straight line through the now non-linear space, thus appearing to bend.

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Gravity bends spacetime, light always goes in a straight line, bent spacetime means straight lines can be curvy. That all checks out.

          But none of that helps you with FTL communication.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    always had this question as a kid

    And then went, draw it out, and asked.
    I applaud that (and the art), good for you.

    (And the good people already provided answers.)

  • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The problem lies in what “unstretchable” and “unbendable” means. Its always molecules and your push takes time to reach the other end. You think its instantaneous because you never held such a long stick. The push signal is slower than the light