• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are any of you even able to afford new cars? Who the hell’s buying this shit? I probably won’t have a new car ever.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Total new vehicle sales has remained roughly static for a little less than two decades. So yes, people can afford new cars.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s sad that you can’t replace the infotainment unit in a new car with an aftermarket unit anymore. I imagine 10 years from now we’ll have a fleet of cars with outdated infotainment systems that can’t connect with whatever future version of bluetooth/carplay/android auto anymore. Imagine driving cars with giant but useless infotainment screens that can’t do anything but playing mp3 off a USB stick because its outdated system can’t connect to your new phone.

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Who wants to buy / drive a 10 yo car though…I feel those get shipped to the 3rd world anyway where people have different needs than the latest connectivity

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Dude im driving a 33 year old car as my daily. Sub 100 thousand miles and gets better mileage than quite a few modern cars, gotta love government fleet cars. Anyways take your classist shit and shove it, just cause you can and your ilk can buy a new car every other year doesn’t mean most people can, will, or want to.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Buying is the first mistake. I’ve never done it, I don’t know anyone who has. Leasing is the way. A depreciating asset like a car is the perfect thing to lease.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Depreciation is a myth. A car is a tool not an investment. And if depreciation is a real worry for normal people then why do houses not depreciate? They don’t last forever. In fact on average they only last 50 years. But their prices never go down. Not until they get condemned. Why doesn’t the price on a 5 year old car go up instead of down? It’s got 10 more years in it easily and it’s proven not to be a lemon.

            But you know what the real insanity is? Paying 400 dollars a month for years for a car with extra restrictions and then having to turn it in or pay even more to own it. Subscription cars need a lot more consideration, like full warranty, maintenance, and insurance for the entire lease period. Upgrade deals at the end. Because the way it is now you’re just giving shit up to keep paying a corporation.

            • suction@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m not paying the lease, the company is. Don’t know anyone who pays for transportation

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Where the fuck do you live that everyone drives company cars? Where I live the closest ya get is company trucks with the water or electric company.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        LOLWUT, I only buy cars that old or older. Why would I spend an absolute fortune on a new-ish car that I barely use anyway when I can get a perfectly reliable older car fir a fraction of the price?

        My current car doesn’t have an infotainment system or any kind of connectivity. It has a 6 slot CD changer.

        • MrStetson@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          And if you want connectivity or infotainment you can just install an aftermarket system, still not anywhere as near invasive as new cars integrated ones

          • Railing5132@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Have you seen a car lately? Whist I’m sure it could be taken out (leaving a raggedy, jagged, odd-shaped hole in the dash…) you’d lose half the functionality of the car with it. These aren’t the single or even 1.5 DIN chassis of yesteryear, and I doubt Crutchfield has a conversion kit that’s going to replace the dash elements, backup camera, steering wheel controls, climate control, vehicle information center, and, for some bizzarro-world reason, the instrument cluster setup options.

            I really can’t stand the modern "everything’s gotta have a big-ass tablet interface with no tactile landmarks. Particularly when I’m hurtling down a narrow corridor in a 1.5 ton metal box and trying to avoid hundreds of other idiots doing the same.

            Bring back buttons!

          • eldavi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            i’ve learned the hard way that the aftermarket makers have learned that planned obsolescence makes them more $$$ and going for similarly aged infotainment systems work longer than many of the new stuff

            • MrStetson@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I have no experience about more complex infotainment aftermarket systems but if it can connect to android and add functionality that way they not obsolete as fast. But pretty much all tech nowdays has planned obsolescence which sucks

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      As long as it can play tapes, I’m okay. Still using a tape adapter to connect my mp3 player :)

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    We cannot stop collecting data about you because collecting the datum that you want to stop having your data collected failed.

    I wonder if the situation in Europe is different, where such bullshit is illegal.

    • downpunxx@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      fuckin europeans. safer and more free from the prying eyes of the data whores, whowouldathunkit. were gettin shafted over here.

      • abacabadabacaba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        How dare they have an election system that lets them elect politicians that are actually doing what the people want instead of having to choose between bad and worse! It must be some forbidden knowledge for sure.

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Don’t get your idealism in a frenzy. The EU has been passing some interesting privacy laws recently, but politics is politics and the EU isn’t immune to lobbying, corruption and incompetence.

          Still way better than the US, i’ll give you that.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I hope people realize that the solution isn’t really to just not buy one, especially since this is the way the industry is heading. The solution is regulations, strict regulations.

    Stuff like this should be a slam dunk for congress but we all know which side they are on.

    • r0ertel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I read somewhere that the thought that you can vote with your dollars makes you feel good and empowered to make choices, but is overshadowed by the fact that doing so means that whomever has more dollars has more votes.

      Regarding Congress, I was really hoping that this big fear of TicTok would result in some sort of GDPR type laws which empower the individuals to take control of our personal data, which could also be used to prevent our personal data from being used against us by foreign countries.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Agreed. It’s really hard to understate how ineffective “voting with your wallet” can be. The fact is simply that nobody honestly cares. Even if you get 100 people to boycott a company, would 100 out of millions of consumers really make a difference? Of course not.

      And of course, you always have cases like this where everybody does it. Same thing goes for TVs - if everyone spies on you, the only real solution is to not have a TV. Yes, I know there are exceptions here and there, but bad practices like these force buyers into making compromises that they shouldn’t have to. Capitalism should be predicated on companies offering the best product to earn their income. It should not be about companies having the least bad product and trying every terrible thing that they can get away with.

      (Of course, we all know that capitalism is a farce.)

      • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well you are voting with your wallet, the only problem is you’ve been out voted. Honda makes good automotives and part of the “price” now is people giving them their data. People just don’t understand/care enough to not want to buy a Honda. If this were really a big deal to people it would open a place in the market for new automotive companies like Rivian, Lucid, or Polestar to gain massive ground by not doing this.

        This is an education issue. We need to inform people about the dangers of a lack of data privacy. If they still don’t care, then so be it.

        • eldavi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          If they still don’t care, then so be it.

          it’s not that they don’t care; it’s that they don’t understand the impact it has on their life and i’m convinced this is true of everything.

          • Railing5132@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’d say a little yes and a little no. I educate every new user that comes into my company on infosec awareness, with a big segment on data footprint and information leakage. I show them where their data is, how easily and with how many ‘channel partners’ share social, history and other data, and where they’ve been exposed in real time. I’ve done this with a few thousand people. The overwhelming majority say: “I’ve got nothing to hide.” Or: “if I get better deals, it’s fine.” not getting that by being tracked they’re probably getting worse deals.

            For the “nothing to hide” folks, I ask to see their wallet or purse. They’re all scoffs and brave mugs initially as they show how unafraid they are as I start rummaging through at the front of the class. Then I start pulling out cards and ID. And they’re still OK as I glance around the room. Then I pull out my phone and tuem my back - then a lot of nervous shifting in seats starts happening as I look over my shoulder while taking pictures of the floor with the shutter sound turned on. That’s the point where I ask if they truly have nothing worth protecting.

            And at the end of all that - after setting up and teaching them how to use the comped corporate password manager, 80% still make passwords that they’ve used before. THE SAME DAMN MORNING as these exercises.

            I don’t think people care. And they certainly don’t know. But they don’t want to be bothered by the nuance of it all. It’s just too much, which is why we need a congress with a goddamned backbone to pass some legislation with teeth to protect customer’s data.

          • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Did you just read the last sentence? Lol. AFTER proper education about the risks of lack of data privacy, if they still don’t care then so be it.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              The thing is, nobody can be educated on everything. It’s impossible.

              Nobody can know every part of a supply chain, how every aspect of everything they buy is made or how it works or the ramifications of all of that.

              It is impossible for a person to do this stuff.

              This is why regulations need to be part of the equation.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The solution is -besides regulations for that - have governments push for much MUCH more bicycle roads and same for public transportation. With great public transportation and bicycle roads, most people won’t need cars to begin with.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        In the USA, that boat sailed long ago… most cities are too spread out to pedal anywhere

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          My city is just too hilly. Cycling around is one thing, and they just put in new bike lanes (they’re not good ones, but still), but doing that with a grocery run or 60lbs of cat food and litter? No thank you.

          • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Weight speeds you up downhill more than it slows you down uphill. The trick is to not coast - keep pedaling downhill, use the momentum to get up the next hill.

            • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Wat? The law of conservation of energy tends to disagree. Commuters are generally starting and ending at the same elevation so there’s no trick. We’re not going to convince anyone to carry heavy loads on bikes by saying “pedal more downhill to smooth out the power requirements if you hate grinding it out on uphills”, the answer is just ebikes.

              • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m just relating my experience - when I was younger, I commuted 20 miles round trip every day, and I worked at a bike shop with weenies that were always trying to shave weight off their bikes, so I did whatever I could to add functional weight (so no filling the tubes with lead, that would be cheating) including building up a dually, two rims side by side on a Sachs 3x7 hub. My average speed was higher when commuting (lots of rolling hills, but overall uphill in the morning, downhill going home) than it was on days off, when I was mainly riding around town where it was flat.

                And it certainly wasn’t because I wanted to go to work…

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I mean, if we are imagining government doing it’s actual job, isn’t it easier to pass regulations then to change how North American cities work?

        Like I support walkable cities, I’m just convinced (majority of) regular people don’t actually want it.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      TBH ending car dependency is a major part of any long term solutions. We should “regulate” this violent and planet wasting catastrophe out of existence replaced with rational and sustainable infrastructure.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m all for reducing the number of cars on the road but IMO this is a poor attitude to have to a problem that exists right now and is ballooning out of control, but has a very easy solution.

        Moving away from cars will take a long, long time. Infrastructure doesn’t come from nowhere, and some places are so sparsely populated that public transport can be a very difficult proposition, or even an impossibility. Those places in particular will be stuck with cars for a while. Banning predatory data gathering on cars can happen right now if there is the political will to do so.

        I know it’s easy for some to say “well I don’t care, fuck anybody who drives a car, they’re evil and I don’t like them. Why don’t they simply be rich and buy a house in a city where public transport is usable?”, but I think everybody has a right to privacy, and the default shouldn’t be for our tools to spy on us and report it back to the OEMs. Particularly when a lot of car drivers don’t have any choice but to drive!

        You can work on strengthening public transport while at the same time improving privacy laws for cars. It’s not one or the other.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not to mention that even if everyone were to switch to public transportation, you’ve still got the issue of RFID cards that track every trip you take on the system. Far cry from subway tokens for privacy concerns.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Then your E-Bike is going to require an online sign in every time you want to use it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The solution is regulations, strict regulations.

      Regulation by whom? Dems are already deep in bed with the automotive industry and Republicans hate the government on a purely ideological level.

      Who is supposed to write (much less enforce) these regulations? Nobody in government wants the job.

  • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like not buying a Honda would be a pretty good way to opt out. In fact since the majority of car manufacturers are doing this bullshit I feel like simply not purchasing a new car is a great way to opt out of this.

    Plenty of older not smart cars that are perfectly usable or fairly easily restored no reason to go dropping the money on a brand new one that’s not only a privacy disaster but a repairability disaster on top of it.

    I think my favorite is how almost all new cars now come with a sealed transmission with absolutely no way to replace the fluid in it with the claims of it being a “lifetime fluid” there is no such thing as a transmission fluid that can last and do its job forever, what they mean by LifeTime fluid is that it will last long enough to satisfy the warranty. And what they have deemed should be the usable life of the car.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m never buying a Honda again after buying a 2018 Civic model. Less than 10k on it when I bought it and the A/C went out. There’s an issue with the condenser on the 2018/2019 Hondas. They offered to pay HALF of what it’d cost to fix - I’d still be out more than a thousand. And from research online, apparently the replacements tend to fail too.

    Pretty much every time I see the same model I ask if the owner has AC. They always have the same problem. It’s going to be real wonderful driving when it gets to the 100’s this summer…

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      So we were told: “it may be covered by this recall, if it’s the parts that are covered by the recall that are the cause of the loss of A/C. If those parts aren’t the reason, it won’t be covered, and the diagnostic to determine that would then be $1,000$.”

      So we have to take a $1,000 gamble to see if our 2018 car is covered under a fucking recall. Fuck Honda in the ass with a rusty anchor.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      And yet the AC still blows cold in my 2004 Honda that’s not ever had the AC serviced… Sad to hear Honda reliability is going downhill.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Pulling the fuse that includes OnStar at least keeps it from calling home. But there’s usually some collateral damage.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Personally I’d call that a safety issue. A few years ago my wife and I were driving a rental car that was rear ended on the highway by a drunk driver. The impact caved in the left rear wheel and spun us 360 degrees across 3 lanes of the highway. Within a few seconds of coming to a stop an OnStar person was talking to us, asking if we were ok and confirming our location.

        We had no clue ahead of time that the rental car had one of these services, but at that moment we were very happy it did. I honestly have no idea about the privacy ramifications, etc. but having been through that experience I’d think long and hard about disabling it outright. I do take my privacy seriously, but I’d have to weigh that against the safety of me & my family in that kind of situation and disable it only as an absolutely last resort… Just my own personal $0.02 on the matter.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think my car only came with a free trial for that service, I think you needed to pay after a certain amount of time. Cell phone works well enough for me.

            • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You’re not alone on the road.

              It’s incredibly unlikely that you’d be in such a bad accident that you couldn’t call for help; while simultaneously being isolated from the public to the point nobody saw your accident and started calling ems/police before you could.

              That’s not to say it doesn’t happen; but I definitely wouldn’t be worried about it.

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I estimate that the probability of injuring my arms and that no one else is around to call for help is low enough to not be worth the monthly subscription.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Imo, the only solution is every device with an antenna must be legally required to put a manual off switch.

    Cell service, wifi, Bluetooth, any future service. If it broadcasts it needs a physical off switch.

    If I sold my car to a government official and they found out I had hidden a camera, microphone and GPS in the car, I’d get a visit from the FBI. Yet companies do it with impunity. Does the CEO of Subaru have recordings of Bernie Sanders driving in his car?

    • DontTakeMySky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      And each type of communication needs it’s own switch. Don’t let them pull some BS trying to make you enable all the hardcore tracking via a cell network just because you want to connect to Bluetooth.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Somewhere in the piece of plastic we somehow call a car. They don’t make them like they used to

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            They sure don’t, cars continue to be safer, more durable, and require less service every model year. The median age of the automobiles on the road gets older every year.

    • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The current generation of the ford mustang Mach-e has its mobile telemetry cellular antenna wired to an isolated fuse that you can just pull out to kill it. I was astonished to learn how straight forward the process is supposed to be.