• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s lovely, and I appreciate the sentiment. It doesn’t change the fact that someone abuses the term in order to force others to listen to BS. I’m not opposed to the ideal, I am opposed to the expectation that people have a right to make you listen to them.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m opposed to the idea, we’ve got enough people that think their ideas need to be broadcast to everyone in the world.

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’m okay with algorithms not recommending certain posts. I just don’t like shadowbans because the platform is lying to the user, the user interface is essentially telling the user “your post is available for viewing and is being treated like any other post” when it really isn’t.

      There’s a balance between the free speech of individuals and the free speech of the company. I think a fair balance between the two is, once a company is big enough to control a significant percentage of the entire nation’s discourse, the company at least has to be up front and avoid deceptive practices like shadow-banning. (This should only apply to large companies, once a company is large enough it has a responsibility to society.)