It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It would work, but only in the impossible world where you have a perfectly rigid unbreakable stick. But such an object cannot exist in this universe.

    Pick up a solid rigid object near you. Anything will do, a coffee cup, a comb, a water bottle, anything. Pick it up from the top and lift it vertically. Observe it.

    It seems as though the whole object moves instantaneously, does it not? It seems that the bottom of the object starts moving at the exact same instant as the top. But it is actually not the case. Every material has a certain elasticity to it. Everything deforms slightly under the tiniest of forces. Even a solid titanium rod deforms a little bit from the weight of a feather placed upon it. And this lack of perfect rigidity means that there is a very, very slight delay from when you start lifting the top of the object to when the bottom of it starts moving.

    For small objects that you can manipulate with your hands, this delay is imperceptible to your senses. But if you observed an object being lifted with very precise scientific equipment, you could actually measure this delay. Motion can only transfer through objects at a finite speed. Specifically, it can only move at the speed of sound through the material. Your perfectly rigid object would have an infinite speed of sound within it. So yes, it would instantly transfer that motion. But with any real material, the delay wouldn’t just be noticeable, but comically large.

    Imagine this stick were made of steel. The speed of sound in steel is about 5120 m/s. The distance to the Moon is about 400,000 km. Converting and dividing shows that it would actually take about 22 hours for a pulse like that to travel through a steel pole that long. (Ignoring how the steel pole would be supported.)

    So in fact, you are both right and wrong. You are correct for the object you describe. A perfectly rigid object would be usable as a tool of FTL communication. But such an object simply cannot exist in this universe.

    • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A perfectly rigid object would be usable as a tool of FTL communication

      Would it though? I feel like the theoretical limit is still c

      • dave@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, that’s the point. The limit c denies the possibility of a perfectly rigid body existing physically. It can only exist as a thought experiment.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, the speed of sound in an object is how fast neighboring atoms can react to each other, and not only is that information (therefore limited to C already) but specifically it’s the electric field caused by the electrons that keep atoms certain distances from each other and push each other around. And changes in the electric/magnetic fields are famously carried by photons (light) specifically - so even in bulk those changes move at the speed of light at most

    • karmiclychee @sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s even wilder when you take the concept of ridgidity and transfer of energy out of the equation and just think in terms of pure information propagating though a light cone. Rigidity itself is a function of information.

    • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      that makes sense, i forgot that pushing something is basically like creating a sound wave on it ^^’ thank you :)