• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    For the curious (and lazy):

    According to repair biz iFixit, the issue with the power-frugal LPDDR memory chips is that the lower voltage they operate at calls for more attention to be paid to signal integrity between the CPU and memory. In practice, this has meant shorter track distances on the circuit board, leading to LPDDR being soldered down as close to the processor as possible.

    LPCAMM2 is intended to address this by putting LPDDR onto a circuit board module that is “cleverly designed to mount right up next to the CPU,” with “very short traces to help maximize signal integrity,” the iFixit team explains in a blog and video detailing their hands-on with the ThinkPad P1 Gen 7.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      the lower voltage they operate at calls for more attention to be paid to signal integrity between the CPU and memory

      And they aren’t kidding around, modern high speed signals are so fast that a millimeter or less of difference in length between two traces might be enough to cause the signals to arrive at the other end with enough time skew to corrupt the data.

      Edit: if you ever looked closely at a circuit board and seen strange, squiggly traces that are shaped like that for seemingly no reason, it’s done so that the lengths can be matched with other traces.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        A millimeter is huge in these situations. USB3 requires 5 mil tolerances, just over 0.1 mm. This scales with the inverse of data rate.

        Electronics are so fast that we gotta take the speed of light into account. God help you if you put too sharp a bend in a trace, too …

          • flying_gel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            A millimeter i.e a thousands of a meter.

            edit: I was wrong, confusingly enough it is a thousands of an inch

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              In the design and manufacture of PCBs (aka circuit boards) a “mil” is a one thousandth of an inch, so it makes sense that’s what is being used in this context.

              Also the maths check out: 0.005 inches is equal to aprox 0.12mm, “just over 0.1mm”.

              • flying_gel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I stand corrected, and I see I didn’t read the comment thoroughly enough either.

                Colloquially as a non-pcb maker I would use and hear the term “mill” as short form millimeter so I assumed it was that.

                so TIL :)

                • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yeah, I found it wierd too when I started designing PCBs (as hobby) that “mill” actually stood for thousanth of an inch.

                  Probably for historical reasons, there are tons of things in the older domains within electronics that are based on inches rather than metric units: for example the spacing between the legs of a microchip in the older chip package formats (so called DIP, the ones with legs that go into holes) is exactly 0.1"

                  The sizes in more modern electronics isn’t usually based on inches anymore, but circuit boards are old tech (even if done with new materials) so there are still a number of measures in there which are based on inches.

              • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Yeah, I’ve never heard of that before either. What I have heard of is either MOA or MIL reticles. In that context a Mil stands for milliradian, which is a representation of angle. That definitely doesn’t track with the post though.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  And it’s especially confusing for people who use sane measurement systems where “mil” is short for “millimetre”, because it’s just the start of the word. I think anyone that still insists on measuring things in thousandths of an inch should keep their own bespoke lingo too, and everyone else should steadfastly refuse to acknowledge “mil” in this context.

              • curiousPJ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                A couple old metrology equipment dated back from the 80s I still use calls them ‘mil’. It’s got dual dials for mil/mm. Gets me confused sometimes because the gauge can go down to couple millionths of an inch/couple 10s of nanometers.

                LVDT for those curious.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Haha, I’m still over here messing with 10/100 Ethernet and USB 2 on my home projects. I’m used to bigger tolerances than the truly high tech stuff.