• mansfield@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    If a hospital can’t operate because some asshole was able to remotely hack it bad enough to basically shut it down, we might need to rethink how things are run.

    • Johanno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Happened in Germany recently. They could continue to operate since everything is still backed up in paper, but everything went slower and new emergency patients couldn’t be accepted.

      It is shocking that the digital level of the hospitals is still in the 70s.

      • Fallenwout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is about funding. The corners IT has to cut is because lack of money.

        Also the amount of legacy operating system to keep hardware like scanners running is a lot. Medical devices are delivered with a workstation that never updates. It is hard to justify buying a new mri of 1.5 million when the accompanied workstation is outdated.

        Sure you can vlan and firewall the hell out of it. But they still have a large attack surface.

    • Fallenwout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They can operate, just slower. Life threatening gets priority, the rest are diverted to nearby hospitals.

      Think of when your gps shuts down. You can navigate by paper map, just slower and you need to pay more attention to avoid mistakes.