Feydaikin

I’m aware of that. It’s mostly to point out that the bombs used on Hiroshima & Nagasaki are basically dirtybombs by comparison with the modern variants.

But at the end of the day, I guess it’s a matter of personal opinion.

Death isn’t pleasant. And I’m personally less scared of atomic bombs than soldiers. Humans capacity for cruelty is only limited by their imagination.

Those where the first generation of nukes. Very inefficient. Like comparing muskets to artillery.

Atomics isn’t the worst way to go.

There’s no broken body or bleeding out. No threat of torture, rape or mutilation.

More than likely the pressure wave will kill you before you even realize what that really bright light is.

The key words here being “I bet…”

OP is just raging at no one in particular.

Ofcause it does. What part of a game that gets attention is a choice.

From visuals to gameplay to sound design and so on. Everything has a priority.

And with priority comes allocation of resources.

I don’t know about Elden Ring. Never got into the Souls games.

But yeah, quest markers in open world games is lazy.

To fair, the “peach fuzz” was a superfluous addition.

As much as I enjoyed Horizon, it was very much a ‘one and done’ game for me. I would have liked more emphasis on replayability than skin textures and raytracing.

But that’s just me. I’m old-school.

Remember the days when it was music?

I dunno, from what little I’ve seen of Ridley Scotts newer films, they don’t live up to his older works.

I’d say they feel uninspired by comparison.

I think the general consesus is that Origins is the way to go with Dragon Age. You’re also more likely to see it go on sale soon now that Vailguard is out.