Agreed. Would have worked better if it said “tangled up”. This is too much of a stretch.
Agreed. Would have worked better if it said “tangled up”. This is too much of a stretch.
Just doing a public service reminder.
Are you? Or did you just think the weird “digital” in the title justifies it being posted here.
The only thing this has to do with technology is that some of the things in the article happen online.
I found an article about it that has some details, you might find it interesting.
Customers own their own Customer Data.
Okay, that’s good.
Immediately after that:
Slack […] will never identify any of our customers or individuals as the source of any of these improvements to any third party, other than to Slack’s affiliates or sub-processors.
You’d hope the owner would get a say in that.
They don’t think that.
Nah, there’s tons of features that slack has over irc. To start with inline media (images, audio, video), but most importantly lots of out of the box external integrations and webhooks.
Thanks for that clarification. I was afraid it would be that murky.
Not through the API.
I’m not a lawyer. But isn’t the reason they had to go to reddit to get permission is because users hand over over ownership to reddit the moment you post. And since there’s no such clause on Lemmy, they’d have to ask the actual authors of the comments for permission instead?
Mind you, I understand there’s no technical limitation that prevents bots from harvesting the data, I’m talking about the legality. After all, public does not equate public domain.
I think creating a lora for your character would help in that case. Not really easy to do as of yet, but technically possible, so it’s mostly a ux problem.
Almost 10 years old now, more relevant than ever: Humans need not apply.
As if their user base has that kind of attention span /s.
So ehm, how old are your kids and how do they like it so far?
I’m with the other person on this one. The question is stupidly vague. Whereas “ever” isn’t very productive, neither is “live up to its hype” - that could mean anything, depending on whoms hype you follow.
All in all, this feels live a clickbait circlejerk article.
Why would you wish for technology to stop improving?
The reason: Apple will charge a 27% fee to developers who want to use the link entitlement program — and when combined with payment processing fees, the total is even more than the 30% the App Store has taken for itself for years, the judge was told at the hearing in Oakland, California.
Motherfuckers.
C’mon. We both know the only reason this gets posted here is because the community has a rage boner for Musk. I’ll agree with you this is business news, and there’s a wonderful sticky about that on the top of this community. I think this counts as much as “tech news” as a workers strike at Samsung’s smart refrigerator department over their retirement plans.
TLDR: “AI” is not always right, and does not fulfil all dreams you may have of it.