Or black people for Trump.
Or homosexuals for Trump (yeah, that is a thing, I don’t get it either).
Etc.
Or black people for Trump.
Or homosexuals for Trump (yeah, that is a thing, I don’t get it either).
Etc.
It baffles me that more Jewish people don’t understand that they’re going to be targeted by the MAGA crowd, because they largely share a common cause with neo-Nazis. It’s super fucking obvious, and they refuse to see it.
It’s pretty obvious to anyone with more than a few brain cells that it’s intended to apply broadly to the government in general.
But of course, the “originalists” love selectively interpreting parts of statements to be the the statement in entirety (in the context of the particular issue they’re trying to opine judicially upon). Which directly implies an absurd level of cognitive dissonance, considering how much those very same judges enjoy bitching about “liberal judicial activism”. They’re 100% ok with judicial activism… as long as it’s not liberal.
They quote the Bible in the context of a court ruling implicitly backed by the full force of the judicial branch, unless and until a successful appeal is made.
There is no context in which including religious references in US court decisions is acceptable, and that’s specifically because of the Establishment Clause:
The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation establishing an official religion, and by interpretation making it illegal for the government to promote theocracy or promote a specific religion with taxes. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from preventing the free exercise of religion.
Emphasis mine.
Yeah and we can all see it, and the fact that precisely zero appellate courts are proactively eviscerating any rulings with that sort of shit attached to it is fucking appalling.
It’s absolutely wild. The last time around, people died, and a lot more were put into financial hardship due to the shitty, hypercapitalist energy infrastructure. People were rightly ripshit angry about it.
And then nothing was done about any of it.
And then people keep voting for the politicians who created and perpetuated the situation.
It’s really hard to keep giving a shit about people who actively work and vote to make their own lives worse.
Lol so how’s that “deregulated freedom” working out for you, Texans?
Ah yes let’s allow a fucking fascist to solidify his hold on power because the non-fascist is very far from a perfect candidate. WCGW?
Pull your head out of your ass.
Eh, yeah, fair point
for real though, watch him get elected.
Genuinely, thank you for doing that.
No I think it’s
people who live in glass pipes shouldn’t smoke rocks
Oh you’re right. I mixed them up.
Tbh I don’t think this is a good idea. Literally every single shred of effort should be going into preventing Trump from winning.
If Trump wins, I genuinely do not believe we will see elections that are even remotely free and fair in the foreseeable future.
Holy shit. Somebody call the burn ward. That’s incredible.
They can’t
ignoreexploit mob violence and not expect it to bounce back on them.
FTFY
Except… this sort of contract is no longer considered to be legal in the United States.
I’m really looking forward to the lawsuits, to be honest.
It’s hard to look at stuff like this and not feel, at some level, that these fascist fuckstains are actively courting political violence with what they do. They’re essentially proving they’re wholly and entirely unaccountable, like a monarch.
They seem to be forgetting that the country was established in large part because people were angry enough about a very similar dynamic a quarter-ish millennia ago that the fought a fucking war over it.
One mooch in hand is worth two in the bush
When they say “homegrown” they mean “home grown”