I guess you wouldm’t be complaining if they never improved efficiencies then, since decreasing costs should apparently be passed on to distributers. Shame on them for improving their business sonthey could use those profits to create the steam deck and other benefits for gamers instead of propping up the profits of game companies!

Should game companies lower their proces based on volume of sales when they make ‘enough’ profit?

30% is the standard, including for physical media on retail stores, and physical stores require all the overhead of stocking with the negatives of losing sales if demand is higher than supply.

Anyone who actually complains about steam’s cut is either misinformed or lying.

Ghe point is that the automatic process tends to be very reliable and instantaneous while hand counts can be used as an auditing process. So machines that are easily auditable and have an inherent paper trail because thenvotes are on actual paper ballots are the best combination of steps for voting.

Auditable machines make ballot stuffing impossible.

Hell, Trump whined that 2016 was rigged even though he won the electoral college.

Trump currently mumbles word salad at his rallies, because he doesn’t need drugs to sound like his brain is failing.

All of the major broadcast networks have always canceled stuff as fast as Netflix, maybe faster since they sometimes cancel shows before the first season has completed airing.

The logo everyone uses to check if something is recyclable is actually a three part reminder: Reduce > Reuse > Recycle.

That is why some bubble packaging has the logo but a reminder to reuse, since it can’t be recycled.

As a society we have skipped completely over the reduce and reuse because of the recycling myth. It isn’t a myth that plastic can be recycled, but that it rarely if ever is because only limited types and in specific conditions are ever cost effective.

Ah yes, run the battery down while charging.

Yes, I know the scale is vastly different between driving charge and game lmaying charge, but it still sounds like revving your engine wile filling with gas.

“That’s beneath even you, Ms. Greene,” shot back the top Democrat on the panel, Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland.

“I can go even lower.” - MTG

He is probably hiding in the dumpster behind the Four Seasons…lawn care service.

15% is a pretty low bar in a winner take all election, and being able to possibly win seems like a reasonable standard if the goal is to have a real debate. In that case I would include the top 5 polling candidates, no matter how low their percentage is. That way there is a chance for sokething to be important other than the talking points of the two major parties.

I don’t think it would be better, but then again the ‘debates’ are pointless any as they are just another place to spout campain slogans, and no actual debate occurs.

Is there self?

She reaped what she sowed.

Other conservatives won’t learn until they personally receive death threats.

This is funny, but not some kind of turning point.

I have no idea either, and that makes it even better.

Edit: I’m not fixing that typo, let him swear to his hat.

💯

Debates are not some kind of regulated and managed thing that exists for candidates to show up to. They are hosted by third parties and all of the rules and setup are decided by the third party and the political parties, so of course rhe two big names get to didctate how they are run. Even having a minimum amount of polling is subjective and part of the process of setting up the debate. If both of the major parties won’rlt show up if a third party candidate with around 10% in the polls is included, the the debate will exclude that third party candidate.

How the hell is captain brain worms polling at 10% without stealing a bunch of votes from Trump? This country is doomed.

Colluding involves communication and coordinated ation. They don’t need to collude because excluding third parties is in their best interest.

Both parties are still wary after the outcome in 1992 when Ross Perot received nearly 20% of the vote after being included in the debates. Neither want to risk having a wildcard on stage.

They used to follow regulations, or at least pretended to.

Now they all sue because they know they have a decent chance of having regulations overthrown by a court system stacked with pro-corporate justices that have zero respect for precedent or the general piblic.

It is his job to promote himself as a candidate and point out his opponents flaws, like being an insurrectionist who can’t stay awake at his own criminal trials.

Rehabilitation requires understanding that doing a thing is wrong. Gore shows no signs that she thinks the thing is wrong, just that the way that the extremist members of the party went about it was wrong, and that it impacted her personally.

I also support rehabilitation, but that isn’t relevant in this case.