The incoming Trump administration will have a say in whether federally backed direct air capture projects in Louisiana move forward

  • nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Worst then that, it is an excuse to continue or increase emissions and distract people from real solutions. We need to reduce emissions first. It might be valuable someday once the low hanging fruit has been dealt with.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    It’s not a single bullet solution. There is no single bullet solution.
    It is one bullet, in a hail of bullets fired at the problem. They’ll all be needed.

  • hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I would say its a yes and. Yes it costs a lot of money and it’s not as efficient as trees long term. But Trees + these machines + no longer burning and releasing CO2 at the current rate + land rewilding = a chance at survival.