• Rabbit R1, AI gadget, runs on Android app, not requiring “very bespoke AOSP” firmware as claimed by Rabbit.
  • Rabbit R1 launcher app can run on existing Android phones, not needing system-level permissions for core functionality.
  • Rabbit R1 firmware analysis shows minimal modifications to standard AOSP, contradicting claims of custom hardware necessity by Rabbit.
  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is one of those shitty products that you can see being shitty from a mile away, yet all the coverage and discussion around it gives it a life it otherwise wouldn’t have had.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Hopes were set unreasonably high because the hardware designer has a great reputation. And the hardware seems well made (for the price) and certainly tries out some interesting new ideas. I love how the camera is physically blocked while not in use for example.

      The software team has let this product down. Not surprising, but dissapointing.

      • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The hardware team made a device that just couldn’t be turned into a good product no matter what the software team did. None of those AI-in-a-box devices are good products because they simply don’t have a reason to exist. Everything they can do, phones can do. If you have a phone, you don’t need one of those AI boxes, however if you buy one of those AI assistant things, you’ll still need a phone (which, again, can completely replace the AI box with no loss in functionality).

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They have so much quality audio equipment, it’s understandable why people would stump for this because of the Teenage Engineering (TE) involvement alone.

        Funnily enough, despite being a TE enthusiast, this is my first time hearing that they had anything to do with this joke of a product.

        …which kind of does make me sort look at TE like… wtf were you thinking? …and sort of definitely makes me question future endeavors from TE. Because this thing is a fucking joke.

        • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Imo TE has always been a shady company in terms of business decisions. I still for the life of me cannot understand why the OP-1 is over 2 grand. It’s a music making machine with a cruddy keybed that’s not even volocity sensitive that’s also intentionally limited in terms of how you can use it.

          Now, don’t get me wrong. I definitely think it’s a cool little device capable of doing cool things. But there’s no way in hell this tiny thing is worth 2k. You can spend 1/4th of the price on something like an elektron Digitakt or a polyend play and get very similar functionality in an arguably better more robust package.

          TE are a boutique company that intentionally releases overpriced products so they can have this reputation of being a “premium” company. Just like Apple. If it weren’t for their pocket operators (which are arguably closer to being toys than actual audio equipment) I wouldn’t think they’d have anything remotely worth buying.

          Side note: the playdate looks adorable. But, similarly to the OP-1, is very overpriced for what it does.