That sounds great, but I don’t understand how they can do that if the debt isn’t to the US government.
The way I understand it, is you owe the hospital money, and after you default, they sell your debt to debt collectors for pennies on the dollar, and then the collectors “own” your debt and harass you and ruin your credit score until you pay.
How does the government have any say on clearing that debt? With the student loan forgiveness, the debt was owned by the federal government, so they can choose to forgive it.
The bill doesn’t really “cancel” any debt, it establishes a grant fund with tax money and allows people to apply for grants they then use to pay off their medical debts.
Rather than telling the debt holders to pound sand, the federal government will front you the cash to pay the debt holder.
The way to drastically reduce medical expenses and thus debt is deregulating health.
From what I remember, you need to have quite a lot of things to become a doctor in the USA, even more to run a related business, and most of those are not about education. So the “supply” here is relatively low.
Also to make education (including medical education, which means - supply again) more affordable the government should just stop subsidizing student loans.
It may have some fixed sum per student allocated, which may be paid for a place, which can be awarded to students from poorer families or something. The “fixed” and “paid for a whole place” parts are important, otherwise this will work just like subsidizing loans - by inflating prices further.
Ah yes, just what the healthcare industry needs, LESS regulation. That’ll keep those for profit companies from gouging people for the life saving measures they need to not die.
Yes, corporate lobbying is a huge problem here and is often used as a weapon to stifle competition and increase profits. At times it’s hard to remember what regulations are meant to do: Protect People from Corporations
We don’t need to remove regulations, we need to improve them.
That sounds great, but I don’t understand how they can do that if the debt isn’t to the US government.
The way I understand it, is you owe the hospital money, and after you default, they sell your debt to debt collectors for pennies on the dollar, and then the collectors “own” your debt and harass you and ruin your credit score until you pay.
How does the government have any say on clearing that debt? With the student loan forgiveness, the debt was owned by the federal government, so they can choose to forgive it.
The bill doesn’t really “cancel” any debt, it establishes a grant fund with tax money and allows people to apply for grants they then use to pay off their medical debts.
Rather than telling the debt holders to pound sand, the federal government will front you the cash to pay the debt holder.
Understood: the debts can get higher now, as the government will pay it…
I don’t think this is the way to go. Not while getting into medical debt like that is still a possibility.
Yes, that’s how demand works.
The way to drastically reduce medical expenses and thus debt is deregulating health.
From what I remember, you need to have quite a lot of things to become a doctor in the USA, even more to run a related business, and most of those are not about education. So the “supply” here is relatively low.
Also to make education (including medical education, which means - supply again) more affordable the government should just stop subsidizing student loans.
It may have some fixed sum per student allocated, which may be paid for a place, which can be awarded to students from poorer families or something. The “fixed” and “paid for a whole place” parts are important, otherwise this will work just like subsidizing loans - by inflating prices further.
Ah yes, just what the healthcare industry needs, LESS regulation. That’ll keep those for profit companies from gouging people for the life saving measures they need to not die.
Now they are using regulations so that you wouldn’t have choice.
Yes, corporate lobbying is a huge problem here and is often used as a weapon to stifle competition and increase profits. At times it’s hard to remember what regulations are meant to do: Protect People from Corporations
We don’t need to remove regulations, we need to improve them.
Historically they were introduced to protect corporations from people. Well, sometimes some collective interests from other collective interests.
It’s an arms race, and one side has more resources than the other.